OOC II

thirdkingdom
Message
Author
User avatar
thirdkingdom
Rider of Rohan
Rider of Rohan
Posts: 7958
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:23 pm

Re: OOC II

#341 Post by thirdkingdom »

VonAlric wrote: Tue Aug 10, 2021 8:19 pm The trick would be to make a bargain that has All of our best interest and none of his but make it look attractive to him.
Gardo could always try the old "Bugs Bunny with lipstick and a skirt" routine.
User avatar
kalstone
Ranger Knight
Ranger Knight
Posts: 1328
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 9:49 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: OOC II

#342 Post by kalstone »

One option is we leave Notai behind, but Svenn slips her his Ring of Invisibility which she uses to escape.
Atlictoatl
Ranger
Ranger
Posts: 522
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:38 pm

Re: OOC II

#343 Post by Atlictoatl »

What's the plan, then?
User avatar
Rex
Rider of Rohan
Rider of Rohan
Posts: 25792
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 9:44 pm
Location: Northern Vermont

Re: OOC II

#344 Post by Rex »

I vote for attack.
User avatar
shaidar
Rider of Rohan
Rider of Rohan
Posts: 12538
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:27 pm

Re: OOC II

#345 Post by shaidar »

clarity on who has/hasn't got weponas & armour or PCs and retinue would be useful in deciding. :)
User avatar
thirdkingdom
Rider of Rohan
Rider of Rohan
Posts: 7958
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:23 pm

Re: OOC II

#346 Post by thirdkingdom »

It's up to you regarding weapons and armor. Let me know if your character would have taken either off while dancing.
User avatar
shaidar
Rider of Rohan
Rider of Rohan
Posts: 12538
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:27 pm

Re: OOC II

#347 Post by shaidar »

I don't think Newton would have removed his axes, they're relatively small. As for armour, if he could have danced in his drake leather he would have, he feels rather snazzy in it.
The_Wanderer
Ranger Knight
Ranger Knight
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:26 am
Location: Chicago

Re: OOC II

#348 Post by The_Wanderer »

If the choice is between fighting Nacknosh now or entertaining the Lord of the Verdant Field and then fighting Nacknosh...I guess I think we should just do it now. Hence my most recent question.
Atlictoatl
Ranger
Ranger
Posts: 522
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:38 pm

Re: OOC II

#349 Post by Atlictoatl »

The_Wanderer wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 6:04 pm If the choice is between fighting Nacknosh now or entertaining the Lord of the Verdant Field and then fighting Nacknosh...I guess I think we should just do it now. Hence my most recent question.
Per the below quote, I think one of the options is to not fight at all:
thirdkingdom wrote: Mon Aug 09, 2021 11:39 pm The deal is:

*Leave all the retainers and mercenaries behind as hostages. If y'all win, everyone lives. If y'all lose *everyone* gets eaten.

*Give Notai, Gardo's deer-folk retainer, to Nacknosh, y'all only need to leave a dozen hostages behind. If you win, you get the dozen hostages back (but not Notai). If you lose, *everyone* gets eaten (but maybe not Notai).

It's not the greatest deal.
User avatar
kalstone
Ranger Knight
Ranger Knight
Posts: 1328
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 9:49 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: OOC II

#350 Post by kalstone »

Perhaps the Lord of the Verdant Field would be interested in helping us against Nacknosh. They certainly seem to have some sort of feud going.
User avatar
shaidar
Rider of Rohan
Rider of Rohan
Posts: 12538
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:27 pm

Re: OOC II

#351 Post by shaidar »

Yeah, that's what I was thinking, too.
The_Wanderer
Ranger Knight
Ranger Knight
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:26 am
Location: Chicago

Re: OOC II

#352 Post by The_Wanderer »

kalstone wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 6:35 pm Perhaps the Lord of the Verdant Field would be interested in helping us against Nacknosh. They certainly seem to have some sort of feud going.
Best idea yet. I'm in. So we leave the mercs and retainers then?
User avatar
Rex
Rider of Rohan
Rider of Rohan
Posts: 25792
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 9:44 pm
Location: Northern Vermont

Re: OOC II

#353 Post by Rex »

I am good with this idea as well.
User avatar
shaidar
Rider of Rohan
Rider of Rohan
Posts: 12538
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:27 pm

Re: OOC II

#354 Post by shaidar »

Ribar would be useful for his spells.
Atlictoatl
Ranger
Ranger
Posts: 522
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:38 pm

Re: OOC II

#355 Post by Atlictoatl »

I'm having trouble determining exactly how many retainers are in the party, but hopefully '12' will cover those most able to assist the party (5 PCs + 7 retainers). It has the added advantage of flipping Nacknosh's number back on him.
Atlictoatl
Ranger
Ranger
Posts: 522
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:38 pm

Re: OOC II

#356 Post by Atlictoatl »

VonAlric wrote: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:45 pm Gardo

"Umm... Whiff.. Whi..spash... You, good sir. I believe that my man said and I prefer that the agreement include that all of our party returns."
I'm unclear what Gardo's specifying, here.
The_Wanderer
Ranger Knight
Ranger Knight
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:26 am
Location: Chicago

Re: OOC II

#357 Post by The_Wanderer »

Atlictoatl wrote: Thu Aug 12, 2021 6:04 pm I'm having trouble determining exactly how many retainers are in the party, but hopefully '12' will cover those most able to assist the party (5 PCs + 7 retainers). It has the added advantage of flipping Nacknosh's number back on him.
Let's See:
  1. Feargus
  2. Gardo
  3. Newton
  4. Whifflespice
  5. Svenn
  6. Shmara
  7. Ribar 4th level priest(Newton)
  8. Wilter 2nd level thief(Newton)
  9. Toma 2nd level fighter(Newton)
  10. Goshawk 4th level fighter(Feargus)
  11. Mardan Cy 1st level bard(Feargus)
  12. Notai 4th level Ceres Brave (Gardo)
  13. Wulfka 4th level fighter (Gardo)
So 1 extra. Either somebody tries to sneak away or the count does not include Whifflespice...which I'm thinking it should not. so maybe we're ok.

Anybody see any missing names?
The_Wanderer
Ranger Knight
Ranger Knight
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:26 am
Location: Chicago

Re: OOC II

#358 Post by The_Wanderer »

TK - I was looking at Into the Wild as I was leveling Goshawk to level 4. What is the damage chart meant to signify for the fighter chart on page 165?
User avatar
VonAlric
Ranger Knight
Ranger Knight
Posts: 1585
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:13 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: OOC II

#359 Post by VonAlric »

Atlictoatl wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 3:18 am
VonAlric wrote: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:45 pm Gardo

"Umm... Whiff.. Whi..spash... You, good sir. I believe that my man said and I prefer that the agreement include that all of our party returns."
I'm unclear what Gardo's specifying, here.
The idea was that all retainers and mercs have to be safe and unharmed from anything, including accidents while the entire group is away. So, if someone gets hurt, the prince has violated his word. And, someone should stay back a ways and 'not return' to help insure that things go out way in case something doesn't work out over at the verdant fields. Basic idea was that Mariusz would either cause or have an accident that allowed him to be harmed while the entire group was away.
It's hard to explain puns to kleptomaniacs because they always take things literally.
User avatar
thirdkingdom
Rider of Rohan
Rider of Rohan
Posts: 7958
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:23 pm

Re: OOC II

#360 Post by thirdkingdom »

The_Wanderer wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 2:11 pm TK - I was looking at Into the Wild as I was leveling Goshawk to level 4. What is the damage chart meant to signify for the fighter chart on page 165?
It's the minimum damage that fighters inflict with all weapons at that level. The idea is that it allows a fighter to use, say, a dagger or short sword and still maintain their damage output, if desired.
Post Reply

Return to “A Brave New World (OSE)”